Dave, sorry about the <different> tag, I'm not sure how this happens seeing as I almost never use the place tag. Perhaps a glitch in JOSM ?? Anyway thanks for pointing this out.
Hopefully I've removed these now

addr:town town is not presented in JOSM (my usual editor) whereas addr:city is. I was not aware NG17 had two postal Cities, my bad. I see now looking Roberts’s error checking page it indeed does, and wiki
https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/NG.html
having a split postal City is unusual I must admit, probably why I missed it, sorry Dave

OK that seems quite clear. I'll try and watch out for that. Thanks for replacing the postal town BTW
Sorry to bother you with all this

Yes indeed, that is the building. You've removed the uprn (error as no uprn for building), and left the street name and post-code (error as no postal town/city named). Next door at Winteringham school has remained unchanged with information for both grounds and buildings. Consistancy? Is there a guide somewhere as to where information shoud go, grounds or buildings? I don't often get involved with mapping schools but it would be good to know.

@confusedbuffalo May I ask why have you choosen to remove all the (correct) data from The Phoenix Park Academy, their website: https://phoenixparkacademy.co.uk/

This site is now throwing up errors on OSM.

Hello AbeOrch, Are you mixing this up this post-box you've added with the two around the corner in Northumberland Street?
They are already on OSM so this would be a duplicate

Fair enough, I have revisited the site several times. A new plate has now been inserted and I've updated the node on OSM.

The box outside Culbowie Lodge seems like a private post-box, belonging to the Lodge. It may have an old Collection Plate inserted or even a made-up one. I don't know, but you've seen it so you know best. https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/box-info/?ref=FK8+158 Fact is according to the post office that Ref No. does not belong here. (look at the link).

Do you not read the attached notes?
Quote "This post box would appear to have the wrong collection plate inserted. From my research this box should be ref. DN34 242 and not DN34 113D as it currently is, which is duplicated at Laceby Road/Nuns Corner. https://i.postimg.cc/3NDNmfrL/DN34-113-D-3.jpg"

My I ask Rupert where/how you aquired the Ref. No for this wall mounted post-box from?
FK8 158 is situated in Main St Gargunnock and is a type b pillar box.

Thats fine. Sorry to be the cause of this trouble

Yes, I was simply following on what had been done before (suburb) It's not always an actual suburb very often a village or even town.
I see no problem with using addr:village
as you say, or both as I have seen used.

Hello,
Imagine somebody looking at the OSM standard map, at this feature, a café. When closed is added it informs folk that this facility that was once there is no longer available. I cannot see it causes any problems, in fact it informs therefore adding information relevant to the item in question.
When you do what you have done, this information is not available. It’s particularly important these days for example where pubs are in the constantly opening – closing - under new management scenario.
If the object is not rendered it is useless, is it not?

Hello, I am not aware of talk-GB is this in the OSM forum? - however the address system in OSM seems to take the postal type address system, with number, street, city, post code. Suburb is not perfect I agree, but with what is available it seems the best option. There is an entry available for place or village but this does not show up on the main dialogue. Therefore I have been correcting the addresses along the lines of the standard postal addresses. As seen here:
https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/PE.html
the postal district PE5 does not have a post office located within it, I believe this is the reason for the error (red) showing. If you pick out another area such as Chelmsford you’ll see the colour variations that indicate errors https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/CM.html
I hope this explains your query

Hi, Yeah lovely beer in the Marton Arms. I believe it was Bing ariel who in turn use Tripadvisor. When I was there I don't actually recall any street signs.
I only intended to edit the pubs contact details, if you think this is wrong data please feel free to ammend. Thanks

I've corrected the post code.
I'm not sure how that happened, '<different>' happens in JOSM when more than one item is selected and they have different values. It is not normally inserted.
Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

You’re welcome

Hi, regarding Kirkoswald are you aware that you've given the post boxes on Main Rd and Balvaird Rd the same ref No.? I believe the one in Main Rd is correct but the one in Balvaird Rd should be KA19 135

Thank you for the response. I had no idea the fire-map even exsisted.
Understood.

Hello,
It is signposted as a public bridleway which is why I added that designation.
I have asked the question of @jordan8396 as to the reason for changing both from bicycle=yes, foot=yes to others but as yet haven't had a reply. I didn't want to change it back to what I had previously marked it as without first asking the person that made the change as to why they did this.