BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 178416979 | 1 day ago | Hi, I don't think your clinic is located on the pavement of Tranquil Vale. I don't think it's at The Shard either, as your website suggests. It could be at The Blackheath Hospital as the address suggests. I've corrected your tags on the POI so could you please place the POI in the correct position. Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 178413415 | 1 day ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Firstly there is no need to advertise or promote your business via changeset comments or tagged descriptions, as they serve no purpose; the public will not see them. It's best to just use a website tag/link on the POI. Secondly I doubt the clinic is situated in the middle of the High Street where you placed it. I think the clinic might be at the Spire Bushey Hospital. I've corrected your tags so you can just move the POI node to the correct position. Need any help, please just ask.
|
| 178401446 | 1 day ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfurtunately your changes to a highway and a hospital outline have resulted in the corruption of the existing data. Thus, to reinstate the original data, I've reverted these changes. I think you have a private clinic at the Royal Free Hospital. This would be a valid feature to map as a POI node. Need any help please just ask
|
| 177996009 | 3 days ago | Hi Ratrun, Yes, I completely agree. I couldn't find any planning or proposal for the roads so please remove them. Regards Bernard. |
| 178200470 | 4 days ago | I've moved it. |
| 178268407 | 4 days ago | Hi, I agree it looks like it's a permanent closure. I would advise contacting your county Highway Authority, asking if the temporary closure is now permanent or when will it be opened again. I have made the crossing section separate. So to remove it with the iD editor, left click to select it, right click and then click delete, (bin icon at bottom of the menu). You'll also have to remove the level crossing tags on the rail nodes. Need any help please just ask.
|
| 178276982 | 4 days ago | Postcodes fixed. Regards Bernard. |
| 178268407 | 5 days ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It's only the level crossing that's closed. From the Essex definitive map, the rest of the footpath is still open to the public. Regards Bernard. |
| 178221835 | 5 days ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping is welcome here, but unfortunately, there are many problems. Buildings joined to highways. Buildings tagged as landuse. Lines tagged as river are used for the lake outline. Duplicated lines around the lake. Unsquared up buildings. I've made a lot of corrections so it looks a lot better now. Could you please take a little time to Learn OSM's best practices of mapping? Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard |
| 178200470 | 6 days ago | Hang On a bit.
Am I correct in this assumption? If so I can correct the location for you. I'll wait for your response. Regards Bernard. |
| 178200470 | 6 days ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've reverted this changeset because it removed a highway making it a business. From your website, I added an office POI where I think the business is located. Is this an online only business? The website mentions a showroom, where is this located please. Regards Bernard. |
| 178134218 | 7 days ago | Hi, the corridor Way: 1449670892 and footway Way: 1454639010, (both at level 1) are on top of each other and joined together at nodes 13340292812, 13340292813 and 12207678247, The corridor Way: 1450130517 and the footway Way: 1454639011 (both tagged level1) are mostly on top of each other though not joined at nodes. The corridor Way: 1450130520 and the footway Way: 1454639004 (both tagged level 0) are on top of each other and joined at Node: 13300525888. There are other instances of footway and corridor on the same alignment but both being tagged as the same level. The steps are tagged at differing levels but I think ought be tagged with the layer tag to describe the vertical relationships between crossing or overlapping elements. The level tags are not for this purpose. Regards Bernard. (I hope this makes sense). |
| 178122410 | 7 days ago | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 178134218 | 7 days ago | Hi, the highways are still duplicated here in those corridors and footpaths on level 1 are on top of each other. I don't know the area, so can't correct it myself. Regards Bernard. |
| 177996434 | 10 days ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed these roads, Way: Kodashpally (1473548429), Way: Chandur (1473548430), Way: Shivanna Gudem (1473548432) because they duplicated existing highways which could disrupt routing. Please make corrections to the existing features. Regards Bernard. |
| 177997243 | 10 days ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed Way: Poleramma thalli temple road (1473554043), because it duplicates an existing highway which could disrupt routing. Please make any corrections to existing features. Regards Bernard. |
| 178001560 | 11 days ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You would be better off reporting that to the highway authority, you can report it via Fix My Street. Regards Bernard. |
| 177944692 | 11 days ago | Hi, You've placed your new 1.5 km roads, Way: 1473222162 and Way: 1473222161 across and on top of all the existing mapping. This surely can't be correct? Are these proposed highways? If so, they should be tagged as such otherwise they could disrupt routing. Regards Bernard. |
| 177929462 | 13 days ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your location for the mosque is in the middle of a public park, I think it's unlikely to be situated here. The tagged postcode is for the properties on Ashburnham Road Close by. Could you please respond to this comment and if you need help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 177754101 | 16 days ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, all the motorway highways and most of the footpaths you've added are duplicating existing highways. Such duplication of highways could seriously disrupt routing. Thus, I've removed all the duplications. It's OSM practice to amend or correct existing features, not map over the top of the feature to make duplicates. I very much doubt if there are motorways on the college grounds. Also the names added look more like descriptions rather than formal names. If you need any help, please just ask. Regards Bernard |