ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 178318866 | 3 days ago | Hi! At Villa Maria, I had to remove the footways you added since there is no separate sidewalk, but instead the footway is shared with the road. There is already a foot=yes tag for pedestrian routing. Thanks and have a nice day! |
| 148617632 | 10 days ago | Yes, it was a mistake, I will fix! Thanks! |
| 177692708 | 18 days ago | Hi! Can you confirm there is a signprohibiting pedestrian here? I did not see any sign recently. Also, prohibiting foot traffic here would make the buildings on Boulevard du Plateau-Saint-Josrph inaccessible for routing. |
| 177198601 | 30 days ago | But after verification, it looks quite fine, so it seems you used the correct offset :-) |
| 177198601 | 30 days ago | Please note that Bing maps from 2020 needs an offset of 0.6,-1.54. See osm.wiki/Montr%C3%A9al#Bing_Maps_Offset Thanks and have a nice day! |
| 177046262 | about 1 month ago | I understand that it would be dangerous/weird to walk there, but is there a sign prohibiting it? If not, the OSM wiki says to use the foot=no or bicycle=no tags only if there is a sign prohibiting access. Thanks and have a nice day! |
| 176488719 | about 2 months ago | J’ai déjà corrigé c’est bon! Bonne journée et joyeuses fêtes! |
| 176488719 | about 2 months ago | Ford Île-Perrot ne semble pas être fermé. C'est en fait un nouveau bâtiment. Pourquoi avoir enlevé les tags du concessionnaire automobile? |
| 175974487 | about 2 months ago | Excellent merci! Je vais voir sur osmose si on peut désactiver la vérifications. |
| 176110347 | about 2 months ago | Super! Thanks! |
| 176110347 | about 2 months ago | I see the wiki explains that cuttings should not count as layer -1, so you are right. Seems weird that layers do not follow the terrain though. Forget what I said in the two other changesets too. Thanks! |
| 176152436 | about 2 months ago | I see the wiki explains that cuttings should not count as layer -1, so you are right. Seems weird that layers do not follow the terrain though. Forget what I said in the two other changesets too. Thanks! |
| 176169415 | about 2 months ago | I see the wiki explains that cuttings should not count as layer -1, so you are right. Seems weird that layers do not follow the terrain though. Forget what I said in the two other changesets too. Thanks! |
| 176169415 | about 2 months ago | Same here, Crémazie stays at layer 0 and Boulevard Pie-Ix goes under (cutting) at layer -1 |
| 176152436 | about 2 months ago | Same here, Henri-Bourassa should be a tunnel at layer -1 and the railway tracks at layer 0 |
| 176110347 | about 2 months ago | Autoroute Décarie is indeed at layer=-1 (cutting). What kind of error did you get? Thanks for any info regarding this edit. |
| 175995906 | about 2 months ago | I fixed the issue by merging before the intersection. Thanks! |
| 175995906 | about 2 months ago | Hi! Can you explain the rationale to remove this transiiton from dual carriageway to single? Now for a car driving from South to North, the router will say: turn left on Rodolphe-Pagé, then turn right on Stuart-Graham, which is not what people understand, it should just say: continue north on Stuart-Graham. So I think the transition was correct. |
| 175974487 | about 2 months ago | Bonjour! Cela a fait l'objet de discussions (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/redundancy-of-oneway-yes-for-junction-roundabout/101043/54) et pour conserver la compatibilité avec les anciens engins de routage qui ne prennent pas pour acquis que les roundabout sont à sens unique et pour d'autres raisons, certaines personnes pensent qu'il vaut mieux conserver le tag oneway=yes. Je vous laisse voir si vous voulez faire un revert ou non. Je suis dans le camp du "conserver le tag oneway=yes" pour éviter toute ambiguité, mais je ne vais pas faire le revert moi-même. Merci et bonne journée! |
| 175597389 | 2 months ago | No problem, it is just that I feel in a T junction, we should keep the carriageway separated until the intersection. |