Hi, you deleted a no longer existing building which is good, but you did not reuse the existing building data correctly, because the footpritns now represent different ones than they did before. Look for a pattern, could a significant portion of existing data all be moved in the same direction to align it?

To see what I mean, have a look at https://osmcha.org/changesets/176202824

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/

Hi, you merged a POI representing a settlement to a building footprint. These features are not directly physically linked e.g. if this building were to no longer exist or if it moved that doesn't mean the settlement would too. I undid this.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175847430

Hi, I think you added some non-buildings here. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8).

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175538178

A task boundary is just a conceptual boundary; if a feature like one of the buildings you mapped here crosses it just map the entire building. If it's a larger feature like a landuse are or highway map just beyond the task boundary so that others can continue mapping them.

A task boundary is just a conceptual boundary; if a feature like one of the buildings you mapped here crosses it just map the entire building. If it's a larger feature like a landuse are or highway map just beyond the task boundary so that others can continue mapping them.

Valid deletion, all footpritns added represent buildings, if you could map the slightly smaller going forward that'd be great.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176009572

Your deletion of the round footprint on the left was valid, becasue it represented vegetation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176009393

This footprint likely repersents a building, but it's oversized.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175817684

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

You duplicated exisitng building footprints.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175817320

Hi, several of these footprints represent yards. If you think something is a building with a complex shape, then double check that it is in fact a building.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176010217

Hi, all footprints you mapped here represent buildings, thanks for moving the one to also align with imagery.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176155492

The vast majority of buildings here represent buildings visible in the imagery, there was a small missalignment to Bing of some buildings which I corrected.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176135809

Hi, it looks like you dragged a node of a highway creating overlapps. If you make an accidental action press the undo button or use `ctrl+z`. I undid the change here.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/

Hi, some of the deletions you made here seem appropriate, because some of the existing building footprints did not accurately represent buildings, however you also deleted a marketplace POI in the process. Worry not; I restored it. just take care when deleting in future, using filters and double checking what you've deleted before uploading can help you prevent and spot invalid deletions.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/

Hi, so of the footprints you added here represent buildings, but around half do not. cross reference Mapbox in this area using check the shortcuts `?` to se how to toggle imagery in ID. See how I mapeed some of these in https://osmcha.org/changesets/176072636

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176038341

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

The footprint in the NW represnets a building the SE one envelopes two. Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/

Hi the footprint you added here represents a building, but it should be squared.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175987683

Hi, the footprints you added here generally represent buildings accurately.

When mapping L shaped buildings are you using the extrude tool `x`?

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/

This looks to me like maybe walls, perhaps of a building which previously had a roof. What's the alternate source you're referencing in this changeset?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175952802