OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
178047585 about 9 hours ago

I'll have to go and have a look the next time I'm in the area.

61874764 about 9 hours ago

Ah - thanks for that.

177331499 about 9 hours ago

Thanks - quite the outlier: relation/11237#map=12/53.7592/-2.1763 !

178430138 1 day ago

Also includes 11 bus into town

178237278 4 days ago

Just wondered is relation/20187045 spelt OK? ("d" rather than "t")?

61874764 7 days ago

What exactly is a "route=administrative"? I'm looking at relation/1549115/history and am confused...

178047585 8 days ago

You wouldn't happen to know if the sign at node/9047561434 is still there or if it has been taken down, by any chance?

178116233 8 days ago

Hello and welcome to OSM!
Just to let you know, there's a bit of a bg in the iD editor where it doesn't warn you if gaps appear in boundary relations like for example Iveruss relation/6445228 here. I fixed that in changeset/178134053 .
If you click on something in the iD editor (like way/1474379891 here) and scroll down at the left-hand side you can see a bit of information about what it is a member of, and if you hover the mouse over the blue bit for each it highlights them at the right (well, ish - there are some bugs in that too).
Best Regards,
Andy

178050925 8 days ago

The procedure for "I received the data from X" data is generally osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines .
I'd expect discussion to include whether the data is accurate (presumably yes) what tags are best, and does anything else need mapping at the same time. It likely does need discussing though.

175863310 10 days ago

Hello VLD319 - please take another look (see e.g. https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#21/51.42443/-0.01403 which has updated - OSM Carto has not yet for me). There's a crossing there at node/8257543236/history that is disconnected from the two new ways that you've just drawn.
There are also a number of missing driveways in this area - if you're going to add separate sidewalks, you really do need to finish the job.

177962210 12 days ago

If anyone would like to discuss this with the DWG please email [email protected] with a subject line of “[Ticket#2025102210000455] 177962210” .

177844392 12 days ago

Actually - I suspect it might have been rerouted. See relation/2293737#map=17/55.647246/-4.813637 . I asked the person who added the new names in the earlier changeset.

168259530 12 days ago

Erm - "office=goverment" for a "building=houseboat" way/1410525442 ?

172383162 14 days ago

What actual evidence do you have for that any part of way/470459862/history is controlled by China?
AS I said at osm.org/user_blocks/19719 you really should discuss this in the forum .

177674320 15 days ago

Thanks!

177490636 15 days ago

I've fixed the two most serious problems in changeset/177845809 and changeset/177846221 .
The "30mph limits that should be 20" obviously need someone to survey them properly on the ground.

177729349 15 days ago

Hello,
Is there really a gap in the Ayrshire Coastal Path at relation/1756394#map=19/55.432354/-4.713113 (perhaps a rockfall or something)?
Best Regards,
Andy

177785770 15 days ago

That explains it - I've restored the original post office node node/5743772095/history and moved it to a likely location.

177808848 16 days ago

Thanks!

177674320 16 days ago

Isn't that what the OSM tag is for, though?
We don't include the word "restaurant" in the name of every reataurant.