Obrigado pela correção. :)

Está central ainda produz energia? Não foi encerrada nos únicos de 2012? https://edp.com/pt/media/historias-edp/ha-vida-na-central-fantasma

Hello Txiko,

Just letting you be aware out that you can do this type of intense mapping sessions much more easily with JOSM instead of iD.

Fantastic micromapping of the region otherwise.

Hello Marc,

Apologies for this, it was a mistake when editing. This will be fixed promptly.

Good spotting. Fixing it now.

Tudo certo, obrigado novamente. https://imgur.com/a/S3fARmV

Obrigado pela correção. Amanhã passo por lá para confirmar.

Good spotting. Mistakes while copy-pasting. Will fix shortly.

Thanks for giving it a fix.

It's done changeset/171309354

In response to changeset/169784436#map=16/51.93205/-8.41176

Hello,

Back home and will will go through them over the next few weeks.

I will delete the circular paths but I would like to keep the tracks leading between farms.

Hello,

Yes, I am onto it. I am away from home at the moment until the end of August then I can review the tracks.

Fair enough, from now on I will be careful placing these farm tracks, and will do a review soon of those I've placed so far. Thanks for bringing this up.

Hello mapbear66, thank you for your nice comment.

About the tracks, the purpose is to show (and allow) routing between farms that are far away from a normal road. I'm referring these parts: way/1418985692

The tracks leading to those parts are often not in aerial photography as you mentioned. To avoid randomness I just do a track that hugs the perimeter to connect these links between farms.

As for the hedges, in most cases I cannot see the barriers themselves from my on-foot surveys, nor in the aerial imagery. I go with the option of mapping these boundaries between farms as scrub since they fit the wiki description of "uncultivated land covered with shrubs, bushes or stunted trees".

Happy to discuss more about this in case you have issues with this mapping.

Looks grand, keep it up!

I will keep this tagging in mind going forward. Thank you for the heads up.

Thank you for the heads up I will change it here and for other places that I have modified.

I agree with your definition that they cannot accommodate motor traffic, these roads are more important than normal footpaths as they are in a shopping area that sees wide used by people.

I feel these ways should still be considered highway=pedestrian.

Could this be oneway=no + oneway:motor_vehicle= yes instead?