Both options are fine.
I don’t mind mapping it as an area… but, contrary to Wolf which I surveyed myself, I don’t know if Ratz uses the entire building here, including the NW extension. Not to mention that, since it is a new building it is difficult to know whether the building shape traced from the current UrbIS imagery is the new one or if they are still showing the old one.
If you have more info or if you want to survey from the inside, feel free.

Merci, mais lLe mieux est de ne pas utiliser le tag "access" car "access=yes" signifie "ouvert à tout le monde (y compris voitures, camions…)", qui n'est pas correct pour un footway.
Nous avons corrigé.

Pourquoi "access=permit" sur ce chemin ?

Ce tag signifie que pour l'utiliser il faut solliciter un permis auprès d'une autorité. Le chemin est ouvert à tout le monde ?

I understand that. The paths are still there, we simply retagged them because, as far I could see on Mapillary pictures, there is a gate barring access.

Private access, right? If access is private, most routing engines will ignore them by default.

Hello,

I am afraid the edit you made on the Toronto subway is not correct.
node/5320046200/history/5

This node, which is attached to the tracks, is a "stop position" node. It is a marker, which is set on the track to indicate where trains will stop along the track. You inadvertently changed it into a station node. By doing so, it means that we now have two stations here instead of one, because the station is already on the map: node/26240972

Station and stop position nodes are two different concepts, this is why they are mapped separately.

I restored the stop position node to its original state.

Bonjour,

Est-ce que c’est une interdiction *légale* ou est-ce simplement déconseillé ?

Je ne trouve aucun panneau qui interdit à un cycliste de prendre la voie rapide à Wahis ou Léopold III. Ce n'est pas une bonne idée, mais c'est légal.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1551614992796912

C'est important parce qu'un cycliste a le droit de quitter une piste cyclable pour changer de direction à un carrefour, et on doit toujours réfléchir à ce point de navigation avant d'ajouter bicycle=no sur des rues.

Des panneaux auraient-ils été installés ici récemment ? Où peut-on trouver l'info ?

Bedankt hiervoor.

oneway:bicycle=no voor fietsers.

oneway:mofa=no voor klasse A
(let op: "moped" is klasse B).

Ik heb dit aangepast.

Volgens uw edit is deze straat nu eenrichting voor autos’s… maar ook voor fietsers, bromfietsers…

In OSM, geldt "oneway=yes" voor alle vervoermodi’s.

Zijn er uitzonderingen hier? Weet u of er M2- (= behalve fietsers) of M3-bordjes (= behalve fietsers en klasse A) hier bestaan? Zo kunnen wij de kaart aanpassen om correcte navigaties voor tweewielers te garanderen.

Hello,

You created an invalid multipolygon.
relation/20177897

Instead of an MP you should draw a single polygon encompassing the two buildings and put the tags to this one.

Hello, and thanks for providing more information. OpenStreetMap is all about information, and therefore we are always happy with more information.

Joke aside, can I please suggest you write better titles when you upload data to OSM. Your last 114 changesets have the same "more information" title as the only description, which unfortunately brings no clue about what you are really doing on the map.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

As far as I can see, in this changeset you added a small pond in the Northwest Territories of Canada and edited the geometry of a few buildings along a road in Zambia.

When you edit remote places, it is strongly advised to update your changes separately. Uploading them together had the unfortunate consequence that the summary of your changeset is now spanning across 3 continents, which is unnecessarily annoying for many of us.

Thanks and happy mapping.

Hello.

Northridge Mall was demolished several years ago.

The "shop=mall" tag had been removed back then, e.g. in this version
way/658897841/history/20

You should *not* introduce shop=mall again, this will make mislead OSM users into thinking they can go shopping there. Abandoned places may be tagged with a lifecycle prefix instead.

Hello, Snare King.

Again, please apply common sense when editing areas.

Do NOT select random places in the world to start clicking on objects until you see a "tag upgrade" suggestion. Many of those suggestions by the iD editor are plainly incorrect.

Here is an example for this Paris station:

node/3530939200/history

A mapper had provided the note to warn you:
note=Please do not add the tag public_transport=station, it is already on the way that defines the footprint of the station

What did you do? You clicked on the "suggestion" in iD and you added "public_station=station", which means that we have duplicate information on the Paris public transport map.

Again, we had to revert your change.

Hello

1-member multipolygon, why?
relation/20175929

Beste,

Die zijn incorrecte multipolygons.
relation/20175853
relation/20175854
(+ many more)

Aub betere opmerking schrijven voor wijzigingensets. "aanpassingen naar de reële toestand" op iedere wijziging is niet aanvaardbaar.
osm.wiki/NL:Good_changeset_comments

Wij helpen u graag, maar aub een betere uitleg over wat u hier wilt op te lossen.

Hello,

Is "Lijn 66" the official name of the bus stop you edited in Portugal?

It seems like you are referring to the route number using it, whereas the *name* is probably something else.

OK, thanks for this double check. I’ll warn the other user that they added incorrect data to OSM, then.

In version #3 of this road, a user surveyed this place and marked this road as complete (10/Dec/2025).
way/1436221934/history

In version #4, you changed it back to a road under construction.

Was the previous user wrong?

Hello,

Can you please write more accurate changeset descriptions when you upload data to the OSM database.

"Amélioration vaira" does not contain any content.

It looks like you are changing tags or moving objects.

A bit of a warning: it looks like you attempted to modify the shape of existing buildings, like this one: way/260260851 while the summary provided with the iD editor announces that you used "CIRB/CIBG most recent aerial imagery" as the background.

This is not acceptable. Buildings outlines in Belgium are obtained from numerical imagery provided by the regional governments. We urge contributors to *never* trace buildings from aerial imagery, because those images are distorted, and buildings have a different distorsion with every year’s release, contrary to the official footprint which matches the official outline.

I will inspect your latest changes in Brussels and revert errors.

Pardon my curiosity but you have just created a tram stop for Olympic Village Station, here: node/13518901699
which is connected to a disused way, having "note=no longer running".

This tram stop will now show as an active station, despite there is probably no service here. Can you please have a second look.

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thanks for updating the map.

Could you please write more useful changeset titles when you upload something to the database. There is no use stating "Added/fixed near <name of the city>" for every changeset. OSM is a geographical database, it is immediately visible that a changeset is here in Edmonton, or that a changeset is in Canmore or wherever. Such a title adds very little useful information.

Instead, people might wonder why a lone mapper obtains all this knowledge about the names of fairly remote places, or the internal ref codes of bus stops. Documenting changes, so that we know whether it comes from your own surveys/explorations, whether you are just clicking on automatic fixes from the iD editor, or whether you are importing government data, for instance.

One more suggestion. Please try to make smaller changes, with one upload for one specific theme/area instead of gerenic stuff all around Edmonton all in the same changeset. This would also make it easier for other mappers, to repair mistakes.

Thanks in advance, and happy mapping.