OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
178318538 2 days ago

Hi, thanks for adding Montreal Crepes et Dumplings Chinois
Do you want to double check the phone number though, it doesn't seem to have the right number of digits.
node/13537140449

171858767 27 days ago

The check data was based on the government data confirming that it exists rather than a site visit, in this instance

171858767 28 days ago

Was this comment meant to go on the note here?
I am not in the area to survey this

176081680 about 2 months ago

This is still marked as a tobacco shop, did you mean to change the category as well?

164846616 about 2 months ago

Hi, see note/5079443 are you sure this bridge exists?

176112280 about 2 months ago

Hi, thanks for adding extra details to Our Lady's Primary.

You accidentally set the whole area as a building, I've reverted that now.

Also, we prefer to map phone numbers in international format, but they get automatically fixed by a bot that I run.

And I don't know why you removed capacity, that is the legal capacity of the school, as per DfE: https://www.get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/Establishments/Establishment/Details/135246
This is commonly mapped on schools.

176045964 about 2 months ago

Hi, are you saying that the library is not active? If so then we wouldn't really map it.

way/1459277814

175872980 2 months ago

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for adding this. Just letting you know that I fixed the phone number. We like to include the country code, so +1-253-752-3360 rather than +253-752-3360 which you had (that wouldn't work if you tried to call it directly like that).

Happy mapping!

175785556 2 months ago

Looks like you're well on the way to no invalid numbers in Canada!

Here:
node/11663930068

It looks to me like "+1-450-978-6888\;5889" was am attempt to denote an extension of 5889, but you removed that bit. There's no website I can see to check against though.

175610269 2 months ago

Hi, thanks for pointing that out, I forgot to move that to addr:suburb, now done in changeset/175709051

175266653 2 months ago

No worries, it was probably a mistake of mine to remove then

175266653 2 months ago

Thank you for pointing out the issue with Oasis Academy Winteringham, which I have now fixed, I must have missed that before.

Main feature tags should always go on the outer way, never on both the building/s and the outer way. Having an outer way is better than having just a building.

UPRNs are a bit tricky since we don't have many sources for what they relate to. I removed the UPRN there since the schools data shows that as the UPRN for the school, and I didn't think it should exist on two objects. I am not certain whether a school grounds and a building will have separate UPRNs.

changeset/175657787

175266653 2 months ago

Hi, I guess you are talking about the building here way/551933154 ?
I removed information from that which was duplicated on the outer way: way/1238980439

I'm not sure what errors you are talking about, but it is appropriate to only have one OSM element per feature, not two as it was.

175590017 2 months ago

Hi, I hope you're getting on well with my phone tool.

I see that you are making lots of single edit changesets. It's very possible to make multiple edits in one go (just keep clicking the fix button and then save when you're done).

I feel like that is more efficient, but you can do whatever you want to.

174369997 3 months ago

Great, I've now updated to use the standard semicolon for the separator of multiple numbers and added the +44 country code

174369997 3 months ago

Hi, thanks for adding these. I'm looking at phone numbers and you seem to have missed a digit off one of the phone numbers on Prestige Dental Care, 0247631492 is too short
node/13288844766

168751417 3 months ago

Hi, great that you're keeping Springfields up to date.
I see that you only added a partial phone number to Craghoppers Outlet here, "01775".
Do you have the full number for it?
Mapped here: node/11160801371

174591788 3 months ago

Comments from other people suggest that it happens when the element has been deleted since the report ran. I will add checks for this so that it doesn't give errors (or make edits) in such cases in future.

174618433 3 months ago

Great, that's helpful to know. I will add better checks against this so it shouldn't happen in future.

174591788 3 months ago

Ok, thank you. If you get the error again, it would be great if you could let me know so I can try to fix it