Thanks again Roydon. ESRI imagery zoomed out has the 2025 changes visible. I edited the map to show the new playground and paths as best i can see. I created a note to remind us (or other editors) to do more work when we have better imagery. I think we are in a decent place for now, maybe in summer 2026 we can improve it even more. Thanks again for pointing out my poor edits.

The Axworthy building overall is now marked as "layer=1". I don't think this is correct, it suggests the entire building is floating, as ground is layer 0. Organic maps doesn't render the building shape, only the building parts, resulting in disconnected parts. Can I remove the layer tag (equivalent to setting layer to 0)?

Thanks for updating this. I just read in the WFP about the proposed new building and went to OSM to remove the old building--and found it already updated. Great work!

Oh good! Yes OSM now looks better than before, closer to its actual alignment. Still not quite sure about pedestrian crossings, maybe we can update in the spring or after a survey (but harder to survey in winter)

Hi Roydon, thanks for your comment. No, I haven't visited this park recently. I checked all the aerial imagery I could, but the most recent dates are summer 2024 (Ex: Winnipeg property map). Usually this is good enough to update OSM. However, maybe i made a mistake here. Are you able to update OSM to correct my error? (i'm also not 100% sure how to revert my edit)

Hi, thanks for your comment. I didn't know editors could make comments comments on changesets.
Tagging "maxspeed=0" is an error, likely i meant to tag 30. However, this is not an actual lane, this is just disused property. maybe we should call it an informal path

Streetscomplete asks me "what's the surface here" (of an alley) and the way is 2 km long--it's impossible to answer. Also, how would I coordinate? Is there a Winnipeg OSM forum?

No problem, glad i found someone able to do the work to revert. I was worried i had made the mistake myself.