OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
178472281 about 6 hours ago

Private driveways can be mapped, it is just that we need to use access=private to prevent general access. Please see: osm.wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

177901751 13 days ago

Hello, the service roads that you added are in fact disused. The ways have been updated to reflect the current situation.

177911808 13 days ago

Hello, you can actually make multiple changes in a single changeset. For example, one changeset can contain different kinds of ancient features like tiled floors and pipelines.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177911808

177822796 15 days ago

Hi, we do not abbreviate road names on OpenStreetMap: please see osm.wiki/Abbreviations

changeset/177867508

177865291 15 days ago

The roads you deleted do exist according to Esri: some are just behind a locked gate.

changeset/177866948

177439710 24 days ago

Node drag fixed in changeset/177479289
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177439710

177440818 24 days ago

Please do not use random gibberish as a changeset comment. This does not help us understand what you were doing, and can increase the chance of confusion with vandalism.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177440818

177317415 26 days ago

The current situation is to map the motorway at toll plazas as a single way, because there are reversible lanes that is demand-responsive (in this case, four). To prevent u-turns, we use turn restrictions.

changeset/177356936

177086448 27 days ago

You are requested not to add filter roads that do not exist, such as:

- way/1466158469
- way/1466158474
- way/1466158476

176961901 about 1 month ago

This changeset had to be reverted by changeset/177078316, because it ignored a request against merging the geometry of the contraflow into to single carriageway: there is a physical divider during roadworks and road should be dual carriageway.

In addition, this changeset appears to be traced from aerial imagery, which I believe is now out of date based on changeset/169416892.

Finally, I am very concerned that you continue to leave vague changeset comments despite being asked to leave better comments (see osm.org/user_blocks/18731).

176138654 about 1 month ago

This changeset has been reverted on suspicion of adding junction layouts that do not exist in reality. The addition of fake junction layouts can be seen as vandalism. Please discuss this matter at: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/report-vandalism-or-concerns-about-edits-here/4223/235 before trying to add back the junction layouts. If your account has been compromised, please reset your password immediately.

175847102 about 1 month ago

Hello, is_in=* and related keys are deprecated in Greece and should not be used at all. If an app is showing the settlement as part of the wrong region or municipality, either file a bug report with them, or contact us at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68 and we will check the administrative relations to make sure the settlement is within the correct region or municipality relation.

176277186 about 1 month ago

We have repeatedly asked you not to add fake junction layouts and filter roads that do not exist. The fake additions have been removed.

176197644 about 2 months ago

Hello, Road relations in Greece can only contain the mainline of the route as members, not facilities such as toll buildings.

Please see osm.wiki/Relation:route for more details.

175010705 about 2 months ago

Source is also Bing too.

169531102 2 months ago

Sorry, I meant https://en.osm.town/@pietervdvn/112928272482062515 .

169531102 2 months ago

Thanks, I've managed to find the reply chain at https://en.osm.town/@pietervdvn/112928272482062515with that link, and the outcome at the time was to mark it as disused. I originally restored the node because user "maurobe57" did not provide a reasonable reply, so I assumed it is still disused.

169531102 2 months ago

Partially undone (buoy restored): changeset/175461804

175418517 2 months ago

Oh sorry, I missed the forum message! My workflow seems to be out of order today.

175418517 2 months ago

Hello, the 1963 decree states that the southern end of the EO5 starts in Rio. I think this is still the case because the ferry still runs for traffic not allowed on the bridge.

I wish to ask what motivated you to cut the southern end of the EO5 back to Antirrio. I think ferries can be part of a national road (since it was the only route between Rio and Antirrio before the bridge opened), but I am open to alternatives to ref=* on the ferry route.