OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
177459680 18 days ago

Hi ftrebien,
Thank you for making the corrections and the clarification. Brazil highway classification rules, noted for our future edits.

177459680 22 days ago

ftrebien, thank you for giving your time to review my edit and also for reaching out to me. Like my friend and colleague World_Winner, I fully understand the cause of your feedback and the decision of reverting the changeset.

I will make sure that I’m aware of lifecycle prefixes in my future edits, where appropriate. Your local knowledge and input are highly valuable, and this communication will help ensure better handling of similar cases in my future edits.

177216153 28 days ago

Hi Ebbsfleet Mapper,

Thank you for taking the time to review this edit, sharing your local knowledge, and reverting the changeset. Upon reviewing Hackney’s web site again, I saw the mention of Sundays. I will take extra care to clarify the information on the resources I use to avoid similar oversight in the future. Thanks again for helping maintain data accuracy and for the constructive engagement.

176612106 28 days ago

Hi @rskedgell,

Thank you very much again for taking the time to visit the location in person for a detailed on-the-ground survey and keeping me in the loop.

Your input and update are well received. Thanks a lot for communicating your concerns to ensure a higher quality on my edits.

176612106 about 1 month ago

Hi rskedgell,
it was not my intention to leave you hanging in this discussion. Since our community manager, Chris Pankhurst has reached out to you via email, we didn’t want to have parallel discussions on this. Thank you for your understanding.

We are reviewing the TomTom edits in the region which have the same issues currently and we will take corrective action on them one by one. Thank you for reverting the changeset and for communicating your concerns on the map quality. Your comments, guidance, and patience on this matter are much appreciated.

176610877 about 1 month ago

Hi rskedgell,
Thank you for pointing out this changeset as well. Based on our recent interaction on changeset/176612106, I am aware of the tagging issue, and I will not repeat it in my future edits. Thank you for your understanding. Changeset reverted.

175944751 about 2 months ago

Hi bxl-forever ,

thank you for your valuable feedback and your understanding. While the bicycle=yes tag was already there before my edit, clarification on both redundant tags is much appreciated on my side and I will keep that in mind on my future edits.

175436008 2 months ago

Hello MxxCon,

Thanks for reaching out. Yes, I’ll look into getting my set-up updated to a more recent JOSM version.

Happy Mapping!

172950731 3 months ago

Hi StreetSurveyor,

Thank you for reviewing the edits and for restoring the previous state of the highway classifications.
I would like to clarify that the changes were made based on OSM Wiki guidance related to functional highway classification rather than navigation data. The intention was to align the tagging with highway importance and network hierarchy as defined in OSM documentation.
However, I understand that there may be existing local mapping patterns and community practices in this region. I appreciate your perspective and the effort you take to maintain consistency in the highway network.
To avoid future conflicts and to improve mapping quality together, could we please align on the preferred approach for highway classification in this area? If there are community-approved references or mapping guidelines for this region, I would be grateful if you could share them so I can follow the same standard going forward.
Thank you again for your feedback and collaboration.
Looking forward to working together to keep the highway network accurate and consistent.

172950731 3 months ago

Hi StreetSurveyor,
Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

Regards,
rajdhani

171955232 5 months ago

Hi SolverTech,
Thank you for reaching out and making the corrections. Your feedback was very helpful for us to better understand cycleways and cycle routes in Czechia and we will take this into account on our future edits.

171482238 5 months ago

Hello ,

way/1427255929,way 1427255930,way 1427255925,way 1427255931,way 1427255932,way 1427255927,way 20024379,way 1427255926,way 1427255924,way 1427255921,way 1427255922,way 20407669 on these ways added access=no tag as per TomTom proprietary GPS traces due to construction of roundabout. We will remove same once construction completed.

Thank you.

152975553 over 1 year ago

Hi mcliquid ,
thank you very much for spotting that issue. Mistakenly I used one changeset for 2 different geographical features. I will be more cautious while performing the edits going further.

146356368 about 2 years ago

Hello Sir, As per your previous comment I made changes with single location. thank you for your valuable feedback.

146350186 about 2 years ago

Hello Sir, I am very thankful for your valuable feedback. By mistake this edit are done in same task.