Thanks mate! The current UK Cadastrals that are easy to use in iD/JOSM have got three distinct blocks in the south of the site. The middle one seems to be too narrow east-west, making the other two too close together. (or something like that.

Done! There were some old note= tags on those segments indicating that the street may have been mis-signed at some point. Have added some streetside images of the current signage and updated. changeset/177782292.

Are you sure about this? I think it's West Ham Lane as far south as Abbey Road. The Greyhound Pub and West Ham Lane Health Centre have addresses on West Ham Lane. Street signage visible on Bing opposite the junction with Densham Road also indicates West Ham Lane. First sighting of New Plaistow Road signage is on the side of the William Hill betting shop at 2 Church Street (e.g. just south of Abbey Road.

Hiya - welcome to OSM! These changes look OK from this armchair. But If I was to visit the new roads in person, would they be going through a construction site? Are the street names shown on local signage?

I was in the area, and for once I remembered to check the Open Notes ahead of time. (But forgot to close them, as you saw)

This relation is where the passenger service name (Mildmay) and service operator (TfL) , network (Overground) and brand (TfL again) is represented on OSM - relation/9674325#map=13/51.51045/-0.12394&layers=N

Are you sure about this? The Mildmay is the customer-facing brand for passenger services on this line. But other services including freight use it too. The line itself is still called the 'North London Line' (see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_London_line) and it is still operated by Network Rail - most full width lines in Britain are.

OK! That makes sense!

should this be service_times rather than opening_hours?

actually, not from survey, from NLS - OS 1:1,250/1:2,500 National Grid maps, 1947-1963

thank-you, LateNightTone!

I'd suggest it's safe to remove this. If the hill is not really noticeable on the ground, and there is no local trigpoint or admissible source for the name, it can probably go.

I see you're in touch with the DG comments section. I note that user "ap" is confident that there is a hill, and the former trigpoint would tend to confirm this.

Hi there. The addition of this node Mill Hill (617339855), v1 in this changeset has attracted Diamon Geezer's attention. Can you recall more about your source?

https://diamondgeezer.blogspot.com/2025/11/mill-hills.html

Another mystery solved!

Thanks! I ended up swapping some buildings around and THEN realised that I'd mess up the UPRN sequence, so I created a temporary tag to swap the UPRNs back. That one shouldn't have been uploaded. It's gone now per changeset/175104726. (Tagged survey, since I was past there last week and spotted the discrepancy)

It might be good to know when a top-level postcode is 'finished' so that missing UPRNs in that postcode can be hunted down.... is E15 'done' yet based on current map data and currently available UPRNs?

Makes sense, and thanks for the response.

In this changeset, several ways are reported (by OSMCha) as 'changed' but it's not clear what the change was - no tag or geometry mods are listed. The ways are: way/681862646 way/681862761 and way/681862654. Did the script somehow 'touch' these ways?

Hiya and welcome to OpenStreetmap. Hope you're having fun! Can I please ask about this changeset? You've removed the place-of-worship tag from the RC church on Arlington Road - is that what you meant to do? This would be the right thing to do if the building is still there, but people no longer worship there. (e.g. it's disused)