OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
115580280 9 days ago

The archaeological site is clearly visible on Esri Clarity and Bing and has an SMR number which means it's a recorded and protected monument.

176625259 about 1 month ago

I hadn't deleted anything from any boundary relations, I only created waterway relations and added the waterways to those. That should not affect boundary relations at all. I checked all the boundaries, and all were complete loops in JOSM.

176625259 about 1 month ago

I hadn't deleted anything from any boundary relations, I only created waterway relations and added the waterways to those. That should not affect boundary relations at all. I checked all the boundaries, and all were complete loops in JOSM.

176460247 about 1 month ago

I didn't find a single broken relation.

176460247 about 1 month ago

I don't know why a new river relation should affect any boundary relations, but I'll look into it.

176460247 about 1 month ago

I don't know why a new river relation should affect any boundary relations, but I'll look into it.

176068382 about 2 months ago

42 warnings ignored by the mapper - changeset reverted, because all the highways along this not signposted path are already mapped.

176068551 about 2 months ago

Reverted, because already mapped and with the established tagging scheme. 184 warnings were ignored by the mapper.

176069246 about 2 months ago

Reverted, because the farm was already mapped with the established tagging scheme.

176069290 about 2 months ago

Reverted, because the farm was already mapped with the established tagging scheme.

176069387 about 2 months ago

Reverted, because the farm was already mapped with the established tagging scheme.

176069654 about 2 months ago

Reverted, because the ringfort was already mapped in the correct location and with the correct tagging scheme.

176110380 about 2 months ago

Reverted, because it was already mapped in the correct tagging scheme.

176110750 about 2 months ago

Reverted, because the viewpoint was already mapped with correct tagging scheme.

176110750 about 2 months ago

Reverted, because the viewpoint was already mapped with correct tagging scheme.

118447018 about 2 months ago

Indeed, I must have misread the blurry British war office map.

118447018 about 2 months ago

Indeed, I must have misread the blurry British war office map.

101043506 3 months ago

I have no idea and I honestly don't fully understand the question.

174826705 3 months ago

I meant to write a diary post about this decision, but I haven't gotten round to it. I mentioned it in one of my last videos, but of course I cannot expect you to watch all of these on the odd chance that I will explain myself.

125833392 3 months ago

I think it's fixed now.