b-unicycling's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 115580280 | 9 days ago | The archaeological site is clearly visible on Esri Clarity and Bing and has an SMR number which means it's a recorded and protected monument. |
| 176625259 | about 1 month ago | I hadn't deleted anything from any boundary relations, I only created waterway relations and added the waterways to those. That should not affect boundary relations at all. I checked all the boundaries, and all were complete loops in JOSM. |
| 176625259 | about 1 month ago | I hadn't deleted anything from any boundary relations, I only created waterway relations and added the waterways to those. That should not affect boundary relations at all. I checked all the boundaries, and all were complete loops in JOSM. |
| 176460247 | about 1 month ago | I didn't find a single broken relation. |
| 176460247 | about 1 month ago | I don't know why a new river relation should affect any boundary relations, but I'll look into it. |
| 176460247 | about 1 month ago | I don't know why a new river relation should affect any boundary relations, but I'll look into it. |
| 176068382 | about 2 months ago | 42 warnings ignored by the mapper - changeset reverted, because all the highways along this not signposted path are already mapped. |
| 176068551 | about 2 months ago | Reverted, because already mapped and with the established tagging scheme. 184 warnings were ignored by the mapper. |
| 176069246 | about 2 months ago | Reverted, because the farm was already mapped with the established tagging scheme. |
| 176069290 | about 2 months ago | Reverted, because the farm was already mapped with the established tagging scheme. |
| 176069387 | about 2 months ago | Reverted, because the farm was already mapped with the established tagging scheme. |
| 176069654 | about 2 months ago | Reverted, because the ringfort was already mapped in the correct location and with the correct tagging scheme. |
| 176110380 | about 2 months ago | Reverted, because it was already mapped in the correct tagging scheme. |
| 176110750 | about 2 months ago | Reverted, because the viewpoint was already mapped with correct tagging scheme. |
| 176110750 | about 2 months ago | Reverted, because the viewpoint was already mapped with correct tagging scheme. |
| 118447018 | about 2 months ago | Indeed, I must have misread the blurry British war office map. |
| 118447018 | about 2 months ago | Indeed, I must have misread the blurry British war office map. |
| 101043506 | 3 months ago | I have no idea and I honestly don't fully understand the question. |
| 174826705 | 3 months ago | I meant to write a diary post about this decision, but I haven't gotten round to it. I mentioned it in one of my last videos, but of course I cannot expect you to watch all of these on the odd chance that I will explain myself. |
| 125833392 | 3 months ago | I think it's fixed now. |